| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Horn-Loaded Speakers» Adding one more spherical to Macondo. (93 posts, 5 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 3 of 5 (93 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3 4 5 »
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Macondo Horns: biography...  Macondo with Pussy Eyes....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     2  61039  05-18-2005
  »  New  The “Primary Frequencies”...  Melody range and the other octaves...  Audio For Dummies ™  Forum     5  75642  09-08-2005
  »  New  The most promising “best” commercial speaker..  Munich High End 2023...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     192  1735314  12-06-2006
  »  New  Macondo's Axioms: Horn-loaded acoustic systems..  A link to another thread....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     120  638039  07-29-2007
  »  New  Proximity of horn’s crossover and it’s ability to care ..  Does this explain or relate to the "trombone"...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     2  35684  09-16-2007
  »  New  60hz, GPA-515-8ghp horn.....  60hz horn...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     32  302719  07-01-2008
  »  New  Audio and the “Alzheimer’s triggers”..  Yet one more 'trigger' not mentioned......  Playback Listening  Forum     3  32066  08-12-2009
  »  New  Other Ways of getting Special Tone from a loudspeaker...  Paul S....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     8  86409  11-27-2009
  »  New  The Evolution of Honk...  Horn-loading and compression had no direct relativity t...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     2  29034  06-06-2010
  »  New  Adding one more non-spherical to Macondo...  Horn suggestions for 300Hz-1000Hz channel...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     23  238826  12-15-2010
08-10-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 41
Post ID: 4988
Reply to: 4985
Vent or Augment?

Romy,

Could you clarify : Would you like to vent the rear chamber or increase its volume (or both)?

jd*

PS : This weekend I will try listening with the rear covers on the Lower-Mids slightly open... I have to admit, I'm a bit nervous about high-passing the S2 much lower than 700Hz at 6dB/octave.



How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
08-10-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 42
Post ID: 4989
Reply to: 4988
The chamber pressure leaking.

 jessie.dazzle wrote:
Could you clarify: Would you like to vent the rear chamber or increase its volume (or both)? This weekend I will try listening with the rear covers on the Lower-Mids slightly open... 

Good question. I do not really know what to answer. I know what I would like to accomplish but I do not know how it should be called.

Conceptually I would like it to have a whole in the back chamber but the whole should be like it covered by a material with variable acoustic transparency: from completely none-transparent to very transparent. My presumption is that if I will be able to introduce a managed and precise drift of pressure from the back chamber then it will be near identical to the increase the back chamber its volume. In fact the managed drift might be even more beneficial (I presume) as it will increase it’s effectiveness with increase of volume of signal.

Sure, it is just hypothetic but when this weekend you will be playing with adjusting the size of the crack on your Lower-Mids you might hear what I would like to accomplish. BTW, share your thoughts if you do not like it and do not forget that you will loose a couple dBs of output .

 jessie.dazzle wrote:
I have to admit, I'm a bit nervous about high-passing the S2 much lower than 700Hz at 6dB/octave.

It is exactly what I’m wondering. The 500-600Hz with second order does fine. Where would be the first order equivalent? This question consists off:

1) How much power the driver will be able to handle. From one side the aluminum cones ten to crack, from another side I drive it with no power: ½ 6C33C and ~14dB divider. I have no answer to it but I hear some dangers sonic effects when I drove the driver with 450Hz first order (25uF)

2) How much LF extension do I actually NEED from my Fundamental Channel? I mean where the quality of the Fundamentals Channel begin to be better or worse in relation to the Upperbass charnel? I would like do not finalize my judgment at this point as currently I have one dedicated Milq Channel driving both Macondo’s Fundamentals and Upperbass Channel. I presume that in a few weeks whwn I go one Macondo Channel to one Melquiades Channel then I will eliminate the S2’s and Fane’s coils talk to each other, not to mention getting rig the  speakers level filter from Lover MF Channel. When I do fully bi-amp then I will review the actual sound from both channels. Yep, it would like to have at that time the opportunity to play with the pressure drift/leak from the S2’s back chamber…

Rgs, Romy the Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-10-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,571
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 43
Post ID: 4990
Reply to: 4985
A range of spacers?
Well, once you get to machining it's expensive anyway, but you might re-use your old cover along with a series of simple shims and/or spacers of varying thicknesses/lengths, and use studs with nuts in lieu of bolts to retain the now-varying-thickness assembly.  This would allow you to re-coup set-up costs by repeating the basic pattern with only its thickness/length as a change.  This would also mean you have to change out the spacers each time to change volume, but it would at least keep the internal pressure +/- consistent (if not constant...) across the driver for any given volume.  If you mean to put in a Schrader valve or threaded hollow bolt (light fixtures), they are available to mount into threads tapped into or a nut welded to a hole drilled through the cover.  Of course the load would change with the temperature, ie, it would not be constant, nor linear, practically speaking.  IF you use a valve to add air, it seems offhand like it might even play out that you get one "measured" pressure while adding air and another pressure a few seconds later, ie, there might be no practical way to "measure/repeat" it IF it is air you are adding.

Somehow it seems like it would be nice to have a fairly dense foam (like that horrible stuff from the can...) coating the "walls" of that chamber.

But then, I am the student here, and I am quite pleased to gravytrain.


Best regards,
Paul S 
08-10-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 44
Post ID: 4991
Reply to: 4985
A microscopic pneumatic valve? The field-coil… diaphragm damping?
What I think I would need is microscopic pneumatic valve that I would be able to stick into my back chamber and that would have a little-bolt that would allow adjusting the diameter of the leaking “port”... Sure, it would be fun to have the valve to be managed very prissily by electromagnet. Hm, I wonder: if it would have an electric driver then how fun would be to drive that valve with an the extracted impending voltage of the actual signal?

VitavoxS2_backChamberVlave.JPG


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-10-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 45
Post ID: 4993
Reply to: 4991
Control that leak!
Try this :

http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/489086

Miniature Cartridge Needle Valve

Beswick Engineering designs and manufactures high-performance miniature fluid power devices.

Beswick introduces a miniature Cartridge Needle Valve for precise flow adjustment in an extremely compact package. This innovative product can be used to control mini-cylinders, nozzles, timing circuits, filling heads, bleed vents, and in many other applications. It is designed for incorporation into manifold assemblies. Cartridge valves in concert with a manifold offer a smaller envelope, reduced assembly time and fewer parts. O-ring seals throughout the valve insure a leak proof installation.

The Cartridge Needle Valve allows precise flow control due to 56 threads per inch adjustment and three degree taper of the needle. The adjusted flow remains stable even during temperature fluctuations as the needle and valve seat are both manufactured from stainless steel. Maximum inlet pressure is 300 psig. The valve controls flows from 0 to 1 SCFM at 50 psig. The metal to metal seal provides positive shut-off down to negative pressure/vacuum of 25 in HG. The installation height is only15/16 inch. The inlet/installation thread is a 10-32 external thread with an O-ring face seal for leak tight connections.

The miniature Cartridge Needle Valve is fabricated entirely from stainless steel and it is available with a wide variety of elastomeric seals to allow excellent corrosion resistance, fluid compatibility and thermal resistance.

Applications include: fuel cell industry, medical and dental equipment, instruments, laboratory equipment, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, aerospace equipment, packaging machinery, industrial robots and many more.

Beswick products include: fittings, valves, quick disconnects, pressure regulators/gauges, cylinders, filters, orifices, shock absorbers, pressure electric switches, tubing, etc. Beswick speaks your language and can custom design products to meet your specific requirements.

For more information, please contact:
Mike Donati
Beswick Engineering Co., Inc.
284 Ocean Road, Greenland, NH 03840-2442 USA
Phone: +1 603.433.1188
Fax: +1 603.433.3313
E-mail: mdonati@beswick.com
Website: http://www.beswick.com


How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
08-10-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 46
Post ID: 4994
Reply to: 4993
control that leak! Part II
Romy,

Forgot to mention... The same people also offer a stepper-motor-actuated version, making it possible to do what you suggested above.

See it here (Scroll down to "Actuated Metering Valve") :
http://www.mediaworks.co.in/beswick/products/custom_products.php

Actuated Metering Valve

This stepper motor actuated valve offers precise flow metering in a hermetic enclosure. The stepper motor actuation provides up to 50 steps of opening/closing and the customizable resistance curve allows the flow response to be tailored to the application. The enclosed design eliminates all dynamic seals for a leak proof operation.

jd*


How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
08-10-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 47
Post ID: 4995
Reply to: 4994
The leaked S2, one step forward & two back

Thanks, Jessie. I just will buy that Beswick Engineering valve, it looks like it is the right size and it look like it will do what I need

I made some experiments applying large gaskets to cover of the back chamber. I used a gaskets up to 12 mm but I did not detect that it impacted sound in the right direction. In fact the maximum chamber size that I was able to get with gasket sounded virtually identical is the default Vitavox chamber size. A 1-2mm crack into back chamber, however, made all different. I will be very enthusiastic to hear your feedback when you try it with your 180Hz horn. The 700Hz first order or the 450-500Hz second order will do, though I do not know if you will be able to stress enough the bottom response of that horn with S2 driver.

As I told, I am as now undecided about the benefits of the S2’s back chamber leaking for the Fundamental Channel. The sound is unquestionably and uncontestable “cleaner” but there are a lot of other things that I would like to consider. For whatever reason that cleaner sound from Fundamental Channel creates overly-necessary “directivity” in sound. The defaultly-damped S2 has it its bottom knee a minor touch of nozzleless, it sounds if it “chough a cold”, it has that hazy, smoky vale that sets an atmosphere of “noble mysticism”. It might have overwhelming amount of measurable distortions but at the same time that refined, superbly articulate and very intelligently-dosed nozzleless, in contacts of proper mixing with the rest of Macondo, can do some tricks, even purely Audio tricks, that are hardly imaginable with others drivers or topologies.

For instants I like set the Fundamental Channel (if recordings allowed of course) that the sound of violin sections are handled by Macondo MF directionally but the sound of English horns, flutes, oboes (if the playing of the give piece and orchestra intended to) is completely  non-directional. A properly set up Macondo, while maintaining extremely strong and very precise imaging for entire orchestra can throw horns or flutes from nowhere, almost like it is out of phase, coming from everywhere, and then, if the players/conductor willing to, then it capable to set the horns at the very precise position right where they should be for a given recording. What I detected that “leaked S2” driver has much cleaner, much much much cleaner sound but it doesn't have that foggy capacity to sound like it come from “nowhere”. It is too directional and too “straight”…

This subject is required more experiments, but to catch that fish would require a clean pond… The electricity now is so bad that it is okay to listening music but it is virtually impossible to do Audio. So, I would propone my further experiments for later, preferably when six-channel-Milq will be up and running, or perhaps you will come up with further observations.

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-10-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,571
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 48
Post ID: 4996
Reply to: 4995
0 - 1 SCFM at 50 PSI?

OK, I am too lazy to run any curves on this, but is that the range of "bleed-off" you want for music?

As I understand it, the [R.] Goldberg Variation screws this thing in and out "really fast" along with the music in order to adjust/compensate for pressure differences?

Would the servo/stepper know the difference between complex material and volume changes?

If this actually "works", you absolutely MUST patent it!

In fact, it looks so good on paper that you should patent and sell it anyway!

Best regards,
Paul S

08-11-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 49
Post ID: 4998
Reply to: 4995
Controlling my own leak!
Romy,

Ok... I tried it... I backed off the screws securing the rear cover on one of the S2s I use with a pair of 180Hz horns. I backed off each screw a total of two turns, leaving a gap of 1.5mm.

I also did some measuring, and had left a 400Hz tone playing when I backed off the screws; I was surprized at just how much sound came out the rear once I vented the cover.

All listening and measuring was done using only one channel, with only the one 180Hz horn connected and band-passed as usual at 790-3200Hz.

Sound ; vented vs. sealed :

With this horn there is not that much difference... Playing a pure tone reveals that with the cover vented the sound goes slightly softer. With a male voice playing I would say that there is a sort of slight effect of increased depth (reminds me of an echo).

I am unable to post the image directly, but below is a link to the measured results taken while playing a closely spaced series of tones from a tone generator at constant volume... I used the exact same set up, and played the exact same series of tones both with cover tight and vented.



The vented cover measures almost identically in my horn... The only area of significant divergence happens at just below 600Hz, where the vented cover driver surprisingly drops out, leaving about a 100Hz gap (click on link to see graph). I ran the test several times to make sure, and got the same results each time.

I don't know why you are getting such clearly better results from your horn with a vented driver.

Now that I have all the measurement stuff out, I think I'll take a "look" at the other horns...

jd*



How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
08-11-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 50
Post ID: 4999
Reply to: 4998
The Bermuda Triangle rediscovered?

Hm, very different and very opposite result, interesting. Are you using the same S2 diaphragm as I do – the metal suspension? If yes then it would be the only one explanation that I might come up with.

Sometime the compression drivers with horn form a very subtle and very bizarre combination when the horn’s throat reactance damps the cone (along with it it’s back chamber) but not juts damps but does it in hipper critical mode when any minute deviation of the loading (like changing the bag-screens density) immediately threw the cone’s damping in one or another extremes. I personally never had it in such a sever care as I have it now but I heard that it might happen and to be VERY notable.

Vitavox did in 180Hz, 220Hz, 300Hz and 330Hz horns, all exponential. We know how S2 behaves in 330Hz – it was made for S2 driver. Interesting that neither Vitavox not any another company that I might recall as not ever did 250Hz hors. Altec did 329A and 311 horns that were 220Hz. The JBL did the same: 220Hz and 300Hz – never 250Hz, at least that I know off. Sure it would not indicate anything, as the balance between the specific driver and the horn size (mass if air in the horn’s belly) is the key. Still, it is juts data…

So, I might presume that at 250Hz and the metal suspended S2 I accidentally hit the “G-spot” of the horn-driver tandem, I am sure that if I measure the driver’s impedance then it will jump like a rollercoaster. Continuing the hypnotizing…. When you went for 180Hz horn you with air in that horn was way beyond the “dangers air-mass” and therefore you did not experience problems. If my hypnotizes is true then I might cure what I have by changing the pressure from back or the front of the cone and then trying to load the driver lower, to see it is will be able to handle it. In fact the leaking of the back chamber is one of those attempts … The sonic differences that I getting is not minor and very easily auditable….

I think if my hypnotize is true then that accidental hyper-fragile equidistant between the cone’ back damping, specific horn size and throat resistance deserved to be named. I propose to call it the “Horn’s Bermuda Triangle”….

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-12-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 51
Post ID: 5009
Reply to: 4999
Slowly rolling back…

I am not quite sure what is going on but wherever is going on is wrong. I was listening this morning Shostakovich’s second cello concerto by Berlin and Rostropovich and I detected that something was not right. It was too direct and “too stereo”, if I might say so. It has no of that smoky sound that is almost mandatory for any cello concerto. The Rostropovich was too prominent, not imaging- or volume-wise but the contrast-wise, it did not make sense…

I decided to close up the back chambers in my Fundamental Channels. It was interesting result. The hi-fi-quality of the recording move down, the articulation of the cello become slightly murkier and the Berlin Philharmonic’s Sound got more ambient and creamier but at the same time the entire play got more sensible, more united.  The lower midrange region become not “too sexy” but instead more dissolves in the rest of the music.

Go figure… I deseeded to close up the S2 back chamber for now and to put any further experiments on hold…

The cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-12-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 52
Post ID: 5011
Reply to: 5009
Back to Bermuda...

Romy,

Just to be sure, I ran all the tests again today, but this time at various volume levels.

I got exactly the same results as yesterday.

To answer your question (sorry it took me this long) : Yes I do use metal suspension on all 4 S2s. I will eventually try the plastic suspended diaphragms.

"...Vitavox did in 180Hz, 220Hz, 300Hz and 330Hz horns, all exponential. We know how S2 behaves in 330Hz – it was made for S2 driver..."

Once I am done with more of this project, I will make a 330Hz Tractrix to try in place of the upper mid 400Hz.

jd*


How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
08-12-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 53
Post ID: 5012
Reply to: 5011
Who cares what Vitavox did?!

 jessie.dazzle wrote:
Once I am done with more of this project, I will make a 330Hz Tractrix to try in place of the upper mid 400Hz.

Hm, I wonder what would be the purpose to make 330Hz horn for you if you have 400Hz and a dedicated lower MF channel? The only reason to do it would be the fact that you experience specific problems with lower knee of your MF channel, do you?  If you are persuaded by the fact the Vitavox did 330Hz horn to use with S2 then be advised that the same Vitavox systems that uses S2 sometimes were equipped with 220Hz “harrow” horns.

Still, I think it absolutely unnecessary for YOU to look at what Vitavox did. All their design with S2 driver were two ways systems and you are, dividing the S2 ranghe to HF and LF, are in way more advanced situation.

I think the 400Hz was a good chose. Let see what changed will be if you go for 330Hz instead of 400Hz? You will be able to driver your MF little harder at it’s bottom - do you need it if you have own Lower MF channel? You also will loose very slightly top end of your MF driver and will have more narrow MF radiation patter. Also, you will have ~60mm larger horn that will make the entire height of your frame’s horns taller. Sure, nothing wrong to make another horn and to experiment if it is easy for you but I would persuade you to use only your tangible sonic motivations to navigate yourself instead juts blindly looking at what Vitavox did.

The caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
08-12-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 54
Post ID: 5013
Reply to: 5012
297.875Hz ; The magic number?
330 or 300 or 297.875Hz... Migh all be just as interesting... Or more likely a complete waste of time.

It does not matter what Vitavox did.

My motivations : There is only one, and it is not related to the lower knee of my Upper MF horn/driver, so you might say I am shooting in the dark like a wounded in the ass audiophile. I understand the drawbacks involved with the larger horn; I would do the experiment only in the name of observing the effect it may have on the "Beneficial Resonance" zone of the S2.

So why 330Hz... Because, based on results of the 400Hz horn, I would not want to go much lower.

If/when I do the experiment, I would probably also make a +or- 500Hz horn with the same aim in mind (it does not take me long to make a small horns if I leave the exterior unfinished).

I am also experimenting with approaches like the one illustrated in the attached image (can't comment on results yet... I have to re-conduct the experiment... I screwed it up).

jd*



How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
08-12-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 55
Post ID: 5014
Reply to: 5013
The Vitavox S2 back chamber stuffing.

I did a lot of those experiments a few years back, stuffing the back chamber of S2 driver with all imaginable things. During that time I did not use a dedicated lower MF channels and was concerned only about the S2 top end. I did not detect any difference in sound, as lease in the area that I was interesting. I might presume that for lover MF the back chamber stuffing might be way more interesting direction to explore.

Still the results of the back chamber stuffing most likely will be correlateable only when the drivers are loaded in identical horn (the same throat reactance). What the chamber stuffing does? Depending of the type of the stuffing it might virtually increase of decrease the size of the chamber, driving primary resonance up or down. I presume that when S2 was made they made (if they ever did it intentionally) the chamber to damp the 330Hz exponential. The volume of air in 330Hz exponential probably is the same as 220Hz tratrix, I do not know the exact numbers, however…

…however, the air’s volume rational might be is very erroneous way to view the things as Vitivox used bogus profile horns, primary stolen from Altec and Klipsch. Therefore, in reality I would not be surprised if they never even thought seriously what they did and juts went for the profile/size of the horn that just would fit the size of their cabinets.

I think all that S2 loading sage should be completely reviewed by us. Nowdays, using S2 driver in our home installations and with contemporary playback demands we are getting from those drivers so much more then they initially intended of imagined that any “default” Vitavox intentions should not be under any attention.

With 6-chenals installation using the S2 drivers we are not in Kansans anymore…

Rgs, The caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
09-27-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 56
Post ID: 5442
Reply to: 5013
Crossing in the middle
For anyone playing with S2s and horns, particularly if contemplating splitting the mid-range between two drivers/horns...

Jessie Dazzle wrote (in the context of the compressed recordings thread) :

"...Another thing that seems to make compressed recordings more tolerable...The other day I tried letting the 180Hz lower-mid horn do more, and the 400Hz upper-mid horn do less, by moving the crossover points up. I need to take time and listen to it more with a clear head. I don't yet know if it is better or worse when playing well-recorded music. I also have not measured the output. My motivation in trying this was to let the the  upper-mid S2 concentrate only on the upper half of the mid-range..."

I've been listening for about one week now with the filters set so the hand off from lower-mid to upper-mid happens higher up (upper-mid S2 is high-passed at 4800Hz instead of 3200Hz), meaning the small 400Hz horn is doing only the upper "half" of the mid range. I left the 180Hz horn as it was (790-3200Hz).

I have been playing everything from content-loaded classical to "modern beat-driven music", to compressed pop, to some damn intense electronic***(ok ok, see note at end)...

I have not measured the output (too many other things to finish). I don't know exactly where the acoustic transition is happening, or if I am leaving a range uncovered. The point is, that the difference is such that I don't need to measure anything to be sure that this is better than when I had the upper-mid horn high-passed (electronically) lower down, at 3200Hz. I was most likely getting some overlap in the crossover region between the two horns (I don't attenuate the 180Hz "Fundamentals Channel", or any other channels).

So the 180Hz horn is currently handling two octaves (electronically), the 400Hz horn is also now handling only two octaves (electronically)... I like what I hear well enough to not ask these horns to do more than this. If measurement reveals an uncovered zone between the two, I would rather add another horn than to ask more of the existing horns...

jd*

***The off-thread "Note at end" :

While I listen mostly to music made by "acoustic instruments" and vocals (lots of "Lieder" recently... I sort of inherited a library), I will, at the risk of completely discrediting myself, state the following:

There IS electronic music that has nothing to do with the thumping mindless "Techno" club, cut & paste poorly recorded garbage we most often associate with the genre... it can be very well done... I would even go so far as to say that it is the genre that most closely approaches classical... and as I am discovering, it can be extremely well portrayed by an as yet incomplete full-range horn system with good lower-bass capacity.

Of course an oboe played by a synthesizer is not the same as the real thing (these guys don't have the means to employ 37 musicians), but listening to this music, one is less looking for that sort of fidelity... There is quality in the sound, but it is more about sheer creativity and the overall message... seen as an abstract representation, in the best cases, the issue of not having the real instrument is just not an issue. Yes it may have started off wanting to be an oboe, but it is now just sound, and of interest here is how that sound is employed. This sort of system will bring out the care that was put into the creation of such music, in a way that has little to do with what we look for (technically) in traditional acoustic performances.


How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
09-28-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 57
Post ID: 5443
Reply to: 5442
I migh be the phase "clicking"....

 jessie.dazzle wrote:
I've been listening for about one week now with the filters set so the hand off from lower-mid to upper-mid happens higher up (upper-mid S2 is high-passed at 4800Hz instead of 3200Hz), meaning the small 400Hz horn is doing only the upper "half" of the mid range. I left the 180Hz horn as it was (790-3200Hz)….

I have not measured the output (too many other things to finish). I don't know exactly where the acoustic transition is happening, or if I am leaving a range uncovered. The point is, that the difference is such that I don't need to measure anything to be sure that this is better than when I had the upper-mid horn high-passed (electronically) lower down, at 3200Hz. I was most likely getting some overlap in the crossover region between the two horns (I don't attenuate the 180Hz "Fundamentals Channel", or any other channels).

So the 180Hz horn is currently handling two octaves (electronically), the 400Hz horn is also now handling only two octaves (electronically)... I like what I hear well enough to not ask these horns to do more than this. If measurement reveals an uncovered zone between the two, I would rather add another horn than to ask more of the existing horns...


The difference between 3200Hz and 4800Hz is practically negligible and I presume that if you do feel a huge difference then it is not because you introduced a 1600Hz gap between the channels. It is most likely that you changing the yours crossover to 4800Hz introduced a phase shift that accidentally “clicked” with the neighboring channels (I doubt that at this point, after changing the crossover, you moved and time re-align the drivers).  You might look at the differences in imaging since you changed the crossover. If you got some precision in imaging then it was phase not amplitude. The amplitude-wise I would not worry at this point too much. All those numbers of electrical crossovers are absolutely not important. What important is the response you get at your listening position – it will be way out there anyhow… You will get RTA in the end and will figure out… BTW, do not forget the doing what you did moved the center radiation point of your installation slightly upper.

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
09-28-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 58
Post ID: 5445
Reply to: 5443
Further observations

Romy wrote :

"...It is most likely that you changing the yours crossover to 4800Hz introduced a phase shift that accidentally “clicked” with the neighboring channels...You might look at the differences in imaging since you changed the crossover..."

Hmm, interesting... The horns are not yet properly located (frames under construction)... in fact they are only sort of close, and at this stage, the L and R channels are not really symmetrical, so I tend to not focus on imaging; even so, I have not noted any differences in imaging with the new arrangement.

Here are some specific observations made with the 400Hz horn high-passed higher up (at 4800, versus 3200Hz):

1) I now use a higher volume setting on the preamp

2) "Cringe factor" has gone down... This simply means that I don't find myself reaching for the volume knob to turn down violin, horn, and upper range vocals passages which are less than absolutely perfectly recorded

3) Due to the higher volume setting, for what seems like the same mid-range output, there is now more output from the bass drivers

4) Overall the sound is now less thin and I would say "warmer"

As you have mentioned in the past, and as I have confirmed with RTA, the 400Hz horn, when high-passed at 3200Hz, is good acoustically down to about 1kHz. I now need to measure the output from the 180Hz horn, but in its current band-passed configuration (790-3200Hz), it will certainly produce sound well above 1KHz, the point where the 400Hz horn was coming on. I was for sure getting ouput from both horns in the 1-3k range, and it is possible that the 180Hz horn alone produces better results in this range (say 1KHz-2KHz) than if accompanied by the 400Hz horn.

As you pointed out, moving the high-pass point up from 3200 to 4800 is only a 1600Hz difference, but what if we look at it in terms of octaves we are asking the S2 to reproduce:

High-passing at 3200 means the S2 in the 400Hz horn will be asked to handle a full two octaves (electronically) :
Octave 1 : 3200 + 3200 = 6400, and Octave 2: 6400 + 6400 = 12800 (where a good S2 will naturally roll off)

High-passing at 4800 means the S2 in the 400Hz horn will be asked to handle only one octave (electronically) :
4800 + 4800 = 9600, plus a bit more above that, until natural roll off of the S2

I'm not sure that means much... I will try to take some measurements soon.

jd*



How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
09-28-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,049
Joined on 05-27-2004

Post #: 59
Post ID: 5446
Reply to: 5445
"I will try to take some measurements soon"...

Very interesting.  I appreciate that you have exposed more of your listening sensations  - that give more objective information, letting to propose more accurately what might took place. In regard to what you say it might not be the “phase clicking” but rather a mild decompression of the upper range S2.

The S2 crossed at 3200Hz at 6dB and pushing in a 400Hz horn 1000hz of air does reaches at it’s bottom the region where a very slight touch of the “Horn Boom” takes place. It is a mild form of honk, very modest and very much not detectable when the channel is supplemented with sub 1000Hz channel.  It is possible that moving the crossover point from 3200Hz to 4800Hz you further up removed the S2 from the Horn Boom region.  (The Horn Boom is always accompany with compression)

I did experimented with it and not detect that moving up the crossover point was a benefit. However, when I did those experiments (2001-2002) I did not use yet use a Fundamental Channel. So, during that time I was merging the S2 driver with my upperbass horn’ upper knee, which had too heavy cone to care 2000Hz. The lower friqency S2 driver should be way more interesting contestant….

Presumably you discovered an effect that worth to imitate or at least to try. Do you have the vertical image shift slightly up when you change your crossover point higher? Anyhow, let see what will be your further finding or perhaps the final findings. However, there are few things that would strongly encourage you to check before make up your mind, all of them are related to the S2 driver in 400Hz horn

1) Make sure that your cone is properly center in a gap. It is very important as misaligned cone will do compression at bottom end

2) Make sure that the driver’s center are absolutely in the center of the horn and absolutely parallel to the horn’s axis.  That is also very important with MF driver. If the driver does not sit in a perfect optical center of the horn then it will have very sever anomalies, particularly when the horn is towed in or out. With the spherical, low throat horns, as we have, it is very simple to misalign the center of the driver for a few fractions of mm.


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
09-28-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
jessie.dazzle


Paris, France
Posts 456
Joined on 04-23-2006

Post #: 60
Post ID: 5448
Reply to: 5443
Correction & Vertical shift
Let me start with a correctoin :

Jessie Dazzle wrote (post dated 09-28-2007):


"...So the 180Hz horn is currently handling two octaves (electronically), the 400Hz horn is also now handling only two octaves (electronically)..."

This should read as follows :

"...So the 180Hz horn is currently handling two octaves (electronically), the 400Hz horn is now handling only one octave (electronically)..."

Romy wrote :

"...Do you have the vertical image shift slightly up when you change your crossover point higher?..."

I need to listen more specifically for it, but I don't recall detecting a shift... This could be because the upper bass driver is now playing at a louder level than before, thus "pulling" the center back down.

jd*


How to short-circuit evolution: Enshrine mediocrity.
Page 3 of 5 (93 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2 3 4 5 »
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Macondo Horns: biography...  Macondo with Pussy Eyes....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     2  61039  05-18-2005
  »  New  The “Primary Frequencies”...  Melody range and the other octaves...  Audio For Dummies ™  Forum     5  75642  09-08-2005
  »  New  The most promising “best” commercial speaker..  Munich High End 2023...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     192  1735314  12-06-2006
  »  New  Macondo's Axioms: Horn-loaded acoustic systems..  A link to another thread....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     120  638039  07-29-2007
  »  New  Proximity of horn’s crossover and it’s ability to care ..  Does this explain or relate to the "trombone"...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     2  35684  09-16-2007
  »  New  60hz, GPA-515-8ghp horn.....  60hz horn...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     32  302719  07-01-2008
  »  New  Audio and the “Alzheimer’s triggers”..  Yet one more 'trigger' not mentioned......  Playback Listening  Forum     3  32066  08-12-2009
  »  New  Other Ways of getting Special Tone from a loudspeaker...  Paul S....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     8  86409  11-27-2009
  »  New  The Evolution of Honk...  Horn-loading and compression had no direct relativity t...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     2  29034  06-06-2010
  »  New  Adding one more non-spherical to Macondo...  Horn suggestions for 300Hz-1000Hz channel...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     23  238826  12-15-2010
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts