Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Horn-Loaded Speakers
In the Thread: ... again on GOTO Unit drivers...
Post Subject: Methodologically reasonable driver's assessment continuedPosted by serenechaos on: 8/18/2008
 Romy the Cat wrote:

 Still, I do not feel that amplification and architectural decisions shell be implied in drivers evaluations, at least during the initial introduction. Of course the driver shell be powered with a proper amp for a given topology, the driver shell be properly loaded, the amps shell be properly loaded. It is no controversy what proper is loading. The contesting drivers shell be identically properly employed. Whatever the drivers demonstrate in respectfully proper operation - is their sound. Then there is the most interesting – how each diver reacts to different external conditions. You see this is the key in my view - the reaction of a driver to own sound under the same different condition but in different operation mode. This  cancels out (well I would say minimizes) all discrepancies with electricity, sources, references, amps, loadings, horning etc etc etc…
The Cat

Yes, Yes, that is what I'm trying to say. 
"The contesting drivers shall be identically properly employed." 

That all drivers are on "level playing field" not handicaped by loading, etc. 
Then one can hear the SOUND of the DRIVER. 

Then hear "reaction of a driver" under "same different condition but in different operation mode."
Yes!
Robert

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site