Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Horn-Loaded Speakers
In the Thread: The Edgarhorn RTA response.
Post Subject: The typical Edgarhorns users: now I feel masochistly pleased.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 8/30/2007
The AA Moron in response to my criticism give a birth something interpretable. Here are the sweeps from Upperbass Horns and MF horn. I have no knowledge if the Moron removed the filters or the EQ circuits that might be used, wich sweeps he used and so on but what is absolutely obviously: the correlation between the given sweeps with the initial sweeps is the evidence that the Sound from that Edgarhorn system was severely butchered. Sadly the butchered sound it exactly what Edgarhorns produce in most of the listening rooms. Should the Edgarhorns be blamed for it?
Defiantly not, look tan the sweeps of the row drivers – very reasonable. The top response of the upperbass channel is challenged. I do not know why it is – a wrong driver, a wrong curve in J-horn or wrong made filter… The MF channel, even if has the stupid EQ circuits, looks fine, it looks like a typical “simple”, HF-deficient JBL driver.. but still very friendly. How that hell with those near exemplary responses the Moron was able to receive the garbage that he presented at the initials post I have no idea. Well, I have an absolutely clear idea what he did but I have absolutely no idea WHY he did the foolishness that he did.
Most likely here is where the typical idiocy of the typical “AA intellectual” is took over and made the Sound in direct correlation with the user’s “typicality”… Now, I feel masochistly gratified! As I always say: any loudspeakers in the hands of barbarian produce barbarian result. Talking about the typical Edgarhorns clientele….
Teh caTRerurn to Romy the Cat's Site