Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: It takes balls to shop (never mind the nuts)
Post Subject: Why, why Abstract Audio?Posted by Max Shatsky on: 12/27/2006
>You might
built better audio or learn to develop more sensitive perception and
you end up with the same results. This why I, staring from a certain
level, refuse to combine audio and music and feel that audio resole
own purely “abstract audio” tasks (and I do not see anything negative
in it) and musicality exist “as is”, completely out of the scope and
our or regards of the audio methods…
Romy, I still don't get why you call it 'abstract audio' and why you put audio out of music context. Yes, audio and music are not the same things, but the type of audio discussed at this forum serves as a tool of conveying musical messages (at least some of them).
A composer can use a violin to create a sense of bird singing. If a reproduction system is incapable to deliver that AUDIO qualities, then the message is lost. That's why you can't get the same results from "built better audio" and "learn to develop more sensitive perception". Different intentions/messages/visions may require different tools/perceptions to convey themselfs.
>"own purely “abstract audio” tasks "
what are these? You mean the taskes that have no connection to music? then why do we need to bother about it (in this forum)?
Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site