Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Didital Things
In the Thread: Myth of CD clocking = True/False
Post Subject: I agree with it but I am not sure that I know the TRUE reason.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 4/24/2015
fiogf49gjkf0d
I think everyone who ever experiment with this did conclude
that a good clock does mater a lot and its location is important. However, itseldom,
if ever, goes any further. In all your (and mine) experiment when we got better
sound by clocking or slaving something we dealt with very specific configuration
and very specific implementations. We connected a given devise to given
interface and we felt it was belter of worse. I am sure it was but what does it
mean? Does it mean that “better” clock always better? I do not know and I do
not think so. You did mention the long term stability that is super important
for clocks and completely irrelevant for audio, I do not think that anybody
make d-clocks “for sound”. We just try different configuration and different interfaces,
differently made data accusations stagers… etc etc… get some accidental better results
and then we feel that new clock made difference. It might be the case and it might
be not. I have seen the situation what belter clocks give undesirable sound. So
my attitude is that if it works then it is great. To explain it is a totally different
matter. Go explain to anybody (or to
yourself) why 75R digital coaxes all sound different. Still we all have a few of them and they DO
sound very different…Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site