Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Melquiades Amplifier
In the Thread: Gas voltage reference 0A2 tubes.
Post Subject: Re: VR tubes stabilityPosted by deemon on: 9/10/2005

itraconazol iqb

itraconazol sandoz 100 mg fabrikant.website
Hi Jack , it's very interesting !

 Jack 14 wrote:


When I was younger -35 years ago-, I have observed the glowing of a NEW VR tube (it was a 0C2) for few hours (ok, I had nothing more interesting to do then..) and seen that at low currents, especially, the ionisation path moves itself randomly between the tubes elements (the ionisation density is never equally distributed vs the element's surface) and that this displacement was translated as small variations of the operating voltage accross. An "old" one does not behaved like this, seeming to have a "preference path" between it's elements. But, interestingly, both were sensitive to magnetic fields (I disturbed the ionisation path at will with a small magnet, creating suddent voltage jumps across the tube).


To sum up, it seems that if you want a stable VR tube, you should age it a few hundred hours and shield it against magnetic fields. Is it making any sense to you ? I do not see why the 5651 cannot behaves similarly.  Was your "bad" tube a never used one ?

Have fun, but beware of the gases !

J14



Of course , both tubes , good and bad , were used , but I think that after it they were "unemployed" for many years . Good tube needed only 3 hours of training to stabilize its voltage , but the bad one needed 3 days ........... I think that little amount of air did penetrate inside the glass , and was absorbed during the training .

Best regards
Dima

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site