Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: It’s mad, mad, mad... electricity.
Post Subject: Ok, let me disagree with this as well.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 6/4/2010
fiogf49gjkf0d
 Bill wrote:
While they may not have tested every unit in the past, they do now. They even send graphs of the testing results with the unit.

Well, I had the very same assurance from them that “we test every unit”. However, when you ask them what they do testing then they will have difficulty to describe it or describe the things that are semi-laughable. The graphs that they send are also absolutely irrelevant. Saying this I do presume that they do invest nowadays more time in QA then they did it in past
 Bill wrote:
I spoke with their engineer before sending one of my units back for a problem that turned out to be a blown fuse, probably due to my running the unit at close to its maximum parameters or over, and he stated that they implimented a strict testing and burn-in program due to the costs of paying for the shipping of units that previously needed to be returned.

You heard it once, after a first minor problem you had right?  How people shall react if the hear it after each problem they had? How many times you think a person shall hear this assurance to become doubt?
 Bill wrote:
Again, these units have given me the cleanest electricity and sound that I've been able to accomplish over the past 30 years, haVING HAD AND TESTED innumerable different so-caled AC cures in my system.

The whole point is that the sound that Purepower produce has absolutely nothing to do with cleanest electricity. The amount of distortions that Purepower outputs is higher than other devises and highly fluctuate with the load type. Still, for whatever reason the sound that Purepower out is hear and shoulders above anything else out there.
 Bill wrote:
So until you plunk your money down and try one of their units in your system, please refrain from commenting on that which you do not know. 

Bill, I think it is absolutely wrong argument. The fact that somebody “plunk money down” is absolutely irrelevant and we are not taking about ownership but about the experience with sonic results. I find the Paul’s position toward Purepower is irrelevant not because he has no vested ownership interest but because he has no idea about the sonic consequence of using Purepower. With know it is difficult for him to assess how much Beta suffering would be considered as “tolerable”.

The caT

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site