GoodSoundClub - Romy the Cat's Audio Site

In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: Romy The Cat's new Listening Room

Post Subject: ...particularly if you have tried it?Posted by Romy the Cat on: 5/16/2010

msaudio wrote:
If you put your speakers in the back extra bedroom, you could have your cake and eat it 2. You will have a normal living room and your headphones sound that you love from small room will be back and better then ever and it don't cost anything except your time and bad back, after you move it again. Then all will learn nothing from ordeal, I am reading these comments and i realize why most people's hifi systems sound like shit because they donot have a clue about audio in the first place. Any 1 that would add solidstate in there line of tube electronics is a nonbeliever in audio purity. EQ bab idea, bass modules center of room a joke, that would be against everything this site stands 4. Preaching Horn Religion MSAUDIO

Msaudio, I have you have a wrong perception about what is going on. I am negotiating and weighing different option. Your proposal to isolate LF section in extra bedroom is no less ridicules then putting the bass modules in the center of room. Do not forget that I am looking for not only pressure building but also proper localization of LF source, not mention the delays from extra bedroom … So, it is ridicules but no less valuable from the perspective of options. Audio is not only about listening and moving boxes but also about thinking. Thinking it is what I am doing nowadays… The digital EQ might be a bad idea but proper thinking implies proper methodological handling of subjects. I sound confident about some subject because I have divert experience in them. I do not have any person al experience with use digital EQ for LF. I know and I pitch that digital EQ is garbage but how about the digital EQ dedicated to sub 40Hz channel? You state that it will be EQ bab idea, can you share more thought on it, particularly if you have tried it?

The Cat

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site