Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: Audio and the “Alzheimer’s triggers”
Post Subject: Alzheimer Triggers vs. Deep Listening CyclesPosted by Romy the Cat on: 8/13/2009
fiogf49gjkf0d
I received a commentary via private emails from a visitor on the site to a section of witch I would like to respond publically as I feel that my reply might slightly elaborates what I was talking about.
I would differentiate the “deep listening cycles” and the “Alzheimer Triggers”. The Alzheimer Triggers are more like the unconditional reflexes. The deep listening cycles I think are subjects of musicality and artistry vs. the Alzheimer Triggers are more the subject of mechanical reaction to sonic irritations. I have detested that some cased the Alzheimer Triggers were sound but were not part of music at all, like the scratching sound of frying pan with a knife of specific material and shape. You would hardly call it music and no one has any deep listening cycles about it. Still, in some cases the knife and the pan might prose some harmonics (it actually happened a few weeks back) which suddenly open a communication bridge with my past memorizes.
When I observed the Alzheimer Triggers, at lease how it works for me, I was not able to stratify past or future listening experiences at the SLLB levels (Static perception, Dynamic perception, Emotional perception, Esthetic perception, Ethical perception, Re-Creative perception, Not Named Level) primary because there was not further listening. The Alzheimer Triggers is an instantaneous event that has no continuation is time. That is why I call it trigger.
The “deep listening cycles” is not even but rather a ceremony, a time-encompassing process that is similar to meditative ceremonies. Also, those “deep listening cycles might” have short- of long-lasting transfigurative function vs. the Alzheimer Triggers have, at least in my experience, absolutely zero consequences.
The CatRerurn to Romy the Cat's Site