Amir:
audio
practice relates to "actual sound" not to (any kind) of overloaded
analysys of "inner character of recorded or played material ". You
don´t analyze sound,
you analyze the capability of a
given "sound-conceived structure" to produce sound. alowing you to
communicate (or not) with music.
Recorded music , continuously or
discontinously "constructed", is not problem for our ears, if a given
threshold of "quality" or "resolution" can connect our brain to the
"communicative potential" music demands. It´s not "what you like"
nor "how it sounds" but What you dont like and what you know and you
are aware of.
Again, the dilemma turns out to be a false dilemma
discussed by people who want to play the game of "adjetives spreading
" on sound and hardware.
You can go for adjetives to the Music, but
please ,never to the sound . That is for sure, Audio practice
requires autodiscipline, not adjetives.
The work to do ( to
reasonable audio-practice ) is to develop own reference points in order
to clean up the way to connect with the music you are aware of, with
the tools you have at hand or may afford after a rational and honest
music listening process.
Regards
|
|